On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote: > Why is it that clojure maps aren't lazy though? > Wouldn't that be just as useful an abstraction as lazy sequences? > Aren't map really just lists of pairs in the end anyway? > how can laziness benefit map usage pattern ? efficient search requires the keys to be in some form of balanced tree(?) so everything needs to be realized while building the tree ?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
