Hi,
On 13 Sep., 04:30, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Unless there's a good reason for :or to work the way it does I think
> that would be a good idea, since then you can define "default" maps
> somewhere else and use those both with the :or keyword or when
> calling the function itself.
The default map specifies the default for the symbols which are bound,
not the source of the values.
(let [{foo :some-key bar "some-other-key" :or {foo 1}} ....]
...)
If you want to provide defaults from outside the function use merge.
(fn-which-does-destructuring (merge defaults-map payload-map))
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
