You remind me that I need to mark http://richhickey.github.com/clojure... as obsolete and redirect users to the new place.
Zack Kim and I are working to have clojuredocs pull data from the autodoc system and, at that point, I assume that he'll add deprecation info over there as well. Sorry for any confusion! Clojure's still a fast moving target. Tom On Oct 26, 12:48 pm, Btsai <benny.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm fairly positive duck-streams is deprecated, as it is no longer > present in the clojure-contrib git repository: > > http://github.com/clojure/clojure-contrib/tree/master/modules/ > > http://richhickey.github.com/clojure-contrib/doesn't have the > deprecation info most likely because it is the documentation for the > original (now outdated) clojure-contrib repository, and doesn't have > 1.2 info. > > http://clojure.github.com/clojure-contrib/is the documentation for > the current repository. > > clojuredocs should probably be updated to include the deprecation > info, and also have its link to clojure-contrib point to the current > repository. > > On Oct 26, 12:44 pm, Victor Olteanu <bluestar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you Btsai. I checked > > bothhttp://richhickey.github.com/clojure-contrib/io-api.html#clojure.cont... > > andhttp://clojuredocs.org/clojure_contrib/clojure.contrib.duck-streams/s... > > and couldn't find any reference to deprecation. > > If you can confirm that this deprecation was made "official" then we could > > update those docs so other people won't run into these same issues. > > > Victor > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Btsai <benny.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't think it's a mistake or accident that spit exists in > > > clojure.core. In 1.2, duck-streams became deprecated and functions > > > such as spit were incorporated into clojure.core: > > > >http://clojure.github.com/clojure/clojure.core-api.html#clojure.core/... > > >http://clojure.github.com/clojure-contrib/duck-streams-api.html > > > > Are you using anything beyond spit and slurp*? If not, I think you > > > can switch to clojure.core's slurp and spit and drop duck-streams > > > altogether. > > > > On Oct 25, 8:59 pm, Victor Olteanu <bluestar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you. > > > > > The following statement worked for me: > > > > (:require [clojure.contrib.duck-streams :as d]) > > > > > As I was using slurp and slurp*, I then had to do the following: > > > > > use the form "d/slurp*" instead (prefixed with d/) > > > > use "slurp" without a change > > > > > This brings up a related point - I can see that there are functions with > > > the > > > > same name in different packages, which I believe it's quite unfortunate. > > > > There is slurp in clojure.core and there is duck-streams/slurp* , along > > > with > > > > other functions such as spit... > > > > > I hope this kind of things might be addressed in future versions of > > > > Clojure... > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > > your first post. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
