On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Carson wrote: >> rseq O(1), reverse O(n). >> peek O(1), last O(n). >> pop O(1), butlast O(n). >> get O(1), nth O(n). > > I don't see that in the documentation... If these functions aren't > "collapsed", then it's better if at least (doc reverse) says something > about O(n) and "see rseq".
The docstring for reverse does say "not lazy", which implies at least O(n). But perhaps it should be more clear. What if there were some additional structured fields for each doc entry, like "performance guarantees" and "see also"? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
