On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Alan wrote: > I guess you stay backwards-compatible by putting it in the docstring, > but isn't it more general, clean, and programmatic to put these useful > bits of information into new entries in (meta f)?
That's pretty much what I was trying to get at with "structured fields", though I was thinking more about the web documentation. I didn't know that Clojure's core functions all have nice metadata. Neat! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
