Hi, On 17 Nov., 13:39, Alyssa Kwan <alyssa.c.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using with-bindings* seems terribly unsupported as well. with-bindings* is official API and the above is a valid use. I would expect that the current situation is there for performance reasons. Resolving the Var each time the function is called is probably too slow. I personally don't see a problem with this situation. When you speak about a virtual "restart" as unmapping *everything* and reloading things, you might be right. But there lies the rub. You don't unmap everything in your example. With my limited imagination I can't see a scenario where the above could arise in a production system, since a "hot update" which removes a but leaves the old b intact could be considered broken since it wouldn't compile when loading in a fresh JVM. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
