On Dec 22, 10:59 am, Benny Tsai <benny.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It does, but doesn't that make it less lazy? To reverse something, it > > needs to evaluate the whole sequence. I yet have to learn how to > > deal with lazyness. > You're right, I hadn't realized 'reverse' is not lazy (I have a lot to > learn about lazyness management myself :)). In this case, though, I > don't think it has too much impact, since:
Just FYI, it's not applicable here but there is also rseq, which returns a reversed view on a collection in constant time. It only works on vectors and sorted maps, though. > By the way, what is "fmap"? See the ns declaration: > (ns karma > (:use [clojure.contrib.duck-streams :only (read-lines)]) > (:use [clojure.contrib.generic.functor :only (fmap)])) Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
