Sure, that would be cool :)

Sorry for the hijack, Marek!

On Dec 23, 5:09 pm, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Benny Tsai <benny.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 11:42 am, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I don't think Clojure has that. Closest is
>
> >> (let [[f & rst] [1 2 3 4 5]
> >>       l (last rst)
> >>       m (butlast rst)]
> >>   [f m l])
>
> >> Output is [1 (2 3 4) 5]
>
> >> Obviously, using the last element is non-lazy. It may well be that in
> >> cases where you'd want to do this you might prefer another data
> >> representation.
>
> > I can imagine some scenarios where it would be nice to do this to
> > sequences.  I guess for now, if those should come up in Clojure, we'll
> > just have to jump through a few more hoops.  Thank you Ken.
>
> You're welcome. Sorry I couldn't be of greater help. If you want, I
> could throw together a quickie macro for grabbing a few items from
> either end of a seq.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to