On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Alex Osborne <a...@meshy.org> wrote: > > Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >>> Actually you don't need to AOT compile records or types. They work fine > >>> for interactive development. > >> > >> Eh. That's not what I saw written elsewhere. Or is it just protocols? > >> Though usually those are used hand-in-hand with records. > > > > Perhaps you're thinking of gen-class? > > No. > > > Protocols are also fine for interactive development. > > Someone here definitely said, recently and specifically, that at least > one of the feature-complex around deftype/defprotocol/defrecord > required AOT compilation. definterface/deftype/defprotocol/et al do not require AOT. structmaps are a legacy feature. defrecord is the way to go now. I've encountered some odd behavior at the SLIME REPL on occasion, but I haven't yet pinpointed a specific flow to recreate. It wasn't serious enough to impede interactive development. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
