Hi, On 28 Jan., 13:46, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote:
> I don't think it's obvious whether any particular serialization > mechanism is generally better or worse than another without knowing > details about a particular context. *print-dup*'s (and others') > generally human-readable representations and dynamic nature are > definitely nice and helpful in some cases; binary serialization > mechanisms – including java.io.Serialization – that are generally > static will usually be a few orders of magnitude faster. Another point is that *print-dup* is not really serialisation, is it? (let [x (list 1 2 3)] [(conj x 4) (conj x 5) (conj x 6)]) With *print-dup* the structure uses a little more memory after reading back. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
