On 27 February 2011 20:50, Mark <markaddle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote that up quickly without thinking much about it. Yes, the > invocation is definitely a macro and not a function. Still, I think > it would be helpful to see the symbol's value and, if possible, the > macro's arity.
Is calling symbols as a function actually used anywhere in Clojure or in the real world? If not, it might make sense to remove this (rather unexpected, IMHO) feature as a backwards-incompatible change. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
