>>> Minor observation, it seems you are using `proxy` to implement >>> interfaces. Why not use `reify` instead? >> >> Thank you for this remark. reify would be more idiomatic, I'll change it. >> proxy is a clojure-neo4j leftover, from which I've forked. > > Last I checked, proxy can extend a concrete class (as can gen-class) > but reify (and deftype, and defrecord) cannot, so there may still be > some use cases for proxy.
I agree, but Jozef doesn't need to extend concrete classes in borneo, he just has a bunch of interfaces to reify :) Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
