On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:49 PM, André Thieme <splendidl...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Maybe there are good reasons why closures should not be real first class > objects, as it is the case in other programming languages that support > them. If that is the case I would really like to hear it. > > I am not interested in the answers of religious fanatics who defend any > behaviour that the current implementation has, even if it obviously > limits the expressiveness. > > > Regards, > André > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
