On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:49 PM, André Thieme <splendidl...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> I am not interested in the answers of religious fanatics who defend any > behaviour that the current implementation has, even if it obviously > limits the expressiveness. > > > Regards, > André > The relevant clojure-dev thread. http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/browse_thread/thread/f4907ebca8ef6e11 It's not clear whether the core team and the various contributors are interested in supporting the behavior you want. It's also not clear whether the issue is matter of the difficulty of a good implementation or simply disinterest. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
