On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:39 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vectors of primitives are more efficient,
[1] > but there's work to be done for them to approach Java > arrays in perf. [2] Aren't your statements [1] and [2] contradictory? Did you mean "more idiomatic" perhaps in [1], or "more functional"? -- Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?! Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a language for a more civilized age. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
