On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh, I'm not saying my own is exploding -- just that macros can be
>> tough for some people to get their heads around, and monads even more
>> so, so combining the two ...
>
> maybe call them something else and it won't be so bad. when people see
> the need for something, they are generally willing to pursue it and
> learn it, i think. the people using clojure are probably somewhat
> self-selectingly smart enough ;-) as long as you don't call them
> monads ha ha.

I'd probably be more insulted by being called macro.

-- 
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a language for a more
civilized age.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to