Alan,
The macro is great (output could use a bit of formatting for readability,
but, hey, I'm not complaining). Thank you very much.
Tuba

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena <restyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Masanori,
> > Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now.
> > I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days.
> The
> > "manual way" is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the
> > intermediate results.
>
> You can actually debug the -> versions even more easily, if you borrow
> my `?` debugging macro, available at
>
> https://github.com/amalloy/amalloy-utils/blob/master/src/amalloy/utils/debug.clj
>
> Then you can simply write
> (-> input
>    fix-ou
>    ? ;; see result of fix-ou phase
>    fix-ize
>    ? ;; see result of fix-ize phase
>    )
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to