Alan, The macro is great (output could use a bit of formatting for readability, but, hey, I'm not complaining). Thank you very much. Tuba
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena <restyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, Masanori, > > Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now. > > I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days. > The > > "manual way" is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the > > intermediate results. > > You can actually debug the -> versions even more easily, if you borrow > my `?` debugging macro, available at > > https://github.com/amalloy/amalloy-utils/blob/master/src/amalloy/utils/debug.clj > > Then you can simply write > (-> input > fix-ou > ? ;; see result of fix-ou phase > fix-ize > ? ;; see result of fix-ize phase > ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
