On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Stephen Compall <stephen.comp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally favor seqable? as the test for plural return values. > sequential? almost qualifies, but excludes sets. seq? fails on account of > rejecting even vectors, but you may feel differently.
And just to do my usual pitch for the new contrib libraries so folks can get used to them and start switching from old monolithic contrib to the new modular contribs... seqable? now lives in [org.clojure/core.incubator "0.1.0"] -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
