> I think a function should generally return the same types for > different input. A seq and a Java array are two very different things > even though Clojure often lets us pass both to the same functions. It > seemed like a small fix, but I guess not everyone agrees.
That's clearly a bug; they forgot to seq one of the two possible return values. File a bug and add a patch. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
