That's interesting. When I try that require A), I get the error in B). Seems that it's trying to find the commands.clj file.
A) ns bkell (:import java.io.FileReader) (:require domain) (:require util) * (:require commands)* ) B) Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: *java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate commands__init.class or commands.clj* on classpath: You can indeed look at the bkell.clj and commands/ source here: - https://github.com/twashing/bkell/tree/jasmine-bdd/src Thanks Sean Tim On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Timothy Washington <twash...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I was hacking away at this at the meantime. I defined 'remove' functions > in > > 2 other places - bkell , commands. I ended up renaming commands/remove to > > commands/removek, and now all invocations are working. But I'm pretty > sure > > I'm using namespace and require erroneously. Currently, I have a source > file > > structure like below: > > src/ > > bkell.clj > > src/commands/ > > add.clj > > remove.clj > > etc... > > > > But each of the 'src/commands/' clojure files, uses the '(ns command > ...)' > > namespace, not '(ns command.remove ...)', etc. I wanted to do it this > way, > > so that client code could just call command/remove, not > > command.remove/remove. But I'm realising that I should instead define (ns > > commands) once, and use (in-ns) in other locations. You can see the > source > > here. Looks like 'get' can be redefined in two other namespaces: bkell , > > commands. But when I try to do that for 'remove', the repl seizes up, and > > I'm curious to know why. > > The require should be: > > (ns bkell > (:require commands)) > > and then you'll reference the functions as (commands/add ...) > (commands/remove ...) etc. > > I'm not sure why (:require commands.remove) doesn't give you an > error... perhaps it was pulling in commands/remove.clj anyway? > > Is there any reason why you have the commands split across multiple > files? (I'm not saying it's bad, just curious) > > I suspect you're somehow calling remove recursively (but it's hard to > tell without seeing more of your code). > > Sounds like you're gradually getting a handle on namespaces... > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
