Baishampayan!

Thank you very much!
Your explanation is best. At last I understand my gap in understanding
of the situation.

Sincerely,
  Ru

On 28 сен, 13:06, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:27 PM, ru <soro...@oogis.ru> wrote:
> > The documentation says that the macro function is called with the
> > arguments unevaluated. So I write code for that function on that
> > assumption. And when I run this code the arguments being evaluated. It
> > does not matter why or how and when! They mustn't evaluated never in
> > that case in accordance with the documentation! That is the question!
> > Because the unevaluated arguments is an important feature that allows
> > you to expand the language using macros.
>
> Let's put it this way - you misunderstood the documentation. What the
> documentation says is correct and defmacro behaves as advertised. The
> arguments are _never_ evaluated when they are _passed_ to the macro,
> but that doesn't mean they can never be evaluated inside the macro no
> matter what you do.
>
> In case of macros, the developer is (that is, you are) in charge of
> _when_ do evaluate the arguments; and you did that when you typed in
> ~e inside the `let` binding. It was your choice and none can do
> anything about it.
>
> Regards,
> BG
>
> --
> Baishampayan Ghose
> b.ghose at gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to