On 28 сен, 13:13, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > You know, in many Lisps let is a macro too. In Clojure it expands to > the special form let* (an implementation detail); a Scheme > implementation might implement it as ((lambda (binding-symbol ...) > expr . exprs) binding-val ...). > > Now, would you expect the following to return (inc x) -- a list of two > symbols -- or 2? > > (let [x 1] > (inc x)) > > There's no promise arguments passed to macros will *never* be > evaluated, that would make no sense at all. They're just not being > evaluated at compile time.
Only Baishampayan explained me at last that evaluation done under MY control :) > > Sincerely, > Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
