Thanks David,

Although not related to core.match, I was playing with your core.logic, I
found that there was no condi (there were only conde condu and conda) .. Is
it just left as a future thing?


Sunil.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:34 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Turns out there was another edge case that I missed around :only which I've
> since fixed in master. Once I resolve MATCH-26 I'll cut another alpha
> release.
>
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
> sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks David for fixing this so fast. It works very nicely... Sorry I
>> couldn't reply sooner.
>> Sunil.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> This should be fixed, I released 0.2.0-alpha4. Feedback appreciated.
>>>
>>> David.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
>>> sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>  I was playing with core.match library and I notice the
>>>> following behavior
>>>>
>>>> let [x {:a 1 :b 2 :c 10 :d 30}]
>>>>              (match [x]
>>>>                [({:a _ :b _ :c _ :d _} :only [:a :b :c :d])] :a-1
>>>>                [({:a _ :b 2} :only [:a :b])] :a0
>>>>                [{:a 1 :c _}] :a1
>>>>                [{:c 3 :d _ :e 4}] :a2
>>>>                :else []))
>>>>
>>>> returns
>>>> :a1
>>>> I was hoping to get
>>>> :a-1
>>>>
>>>> Am I using it wrong? Have I misunderstood as to how match is supposed to
>>>> work? It looks like match assumes either that there is always a unique 
>>>> match
>>>> or it does not guarantee that it will the try matches in the order
>>>> specified. Can somebody help?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sunil.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to