There is no conde as defined in The Reasoned Schemer in core.logic. conde in
core.logic is condi.
David
On Friday, October 7, 2011, Sunil S Nandihalli <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks David,
> Although not related to core.match, I was playing with your core.logic, I
found that there was no condi (there were only conde condu and conda) .. Is
it just left as a future thing?
>
> Sunil.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:34 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Turns out there was another edge case that I missed around :only which
I've since fixed in master. Once I resolve MATCH-26 I'll cut another alpha
release.
> David
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks David for fixing this so fast. It works very nicely... Sorry I
couldn't reply sooner.
> Sunil.
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> This should be fixed, I released 0.2.0-alpha4. Feedback appreciated.
> David.
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> I was playing with core.match library and I notice the following behavior
> let [x {:a 1 :b 2 :c 10 :d 30}]
> (match [x]
> [({:a _ :b _ :c _ :d _} :only [:a :b :c :d])] :a-1
> [({:a _ :b 2} :only [:a :b])] :a0
> [{:a 1 :c _}] :a1
> [{:c 3 :d _ :e 4}] :a2
> :else []))
> returns
> :a1
> I was hoping to get
> :a-1
> Am I using it wrong? Have I misunderstood as to how match is supposed to
work? It looks like match assumes either that there is always a unique match
or it does not guarantee that it will the try matches in the order
specified. Can somebody help?
> Thanks,
> Sunil.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscribe
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
