On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant < abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While we're on the topic of conventions, I think the most important > convention match is breaking > is using the destructuring syntax to mean something less generic by default > (only vectors). > > (match [(list 1 2 3)] > [[x & xs]] 1) ;; <- falls through because [x & xs] only > matches vectors by default > We can support this but I'm afraid that it will be very slow. In the presence of rest syntax vector patterns split the data structure into left and right sides. But again, perhaps this is a case of user friendliness and people don't care that much? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
