FYI: some time ago the Opensuse project used such a collaborative tool (http://www.co-ment.com) in order to get a shared mindset of its goals. This was the result, see how clicking on higlight words points to their comments: https://lite.co-ment.com/text/lNPCgzeGHdV/view/
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Jomphe <danieljom...@gmail.com> wrote: > With the tools available to us today, there's no reason why we at least > shouldn't have everything needed to make literate programming more seamless, > more natural. For example, while reading your toy example, I found myself > wanting to ask a question or comment on your thoughts a few times. If your > book had been displayed on a dynamic website geared towards literate > programming, I might have been able to click on a paragraph and write my > question/comment right there. And then, after a short conversation there, > you would have integrated the fruits of our conversation directly into the > end result. Thus each new reader would have been an occasion to improve the > book. ...It's nothing surprising since this kind of review system already > exists in some publishers' toolkits. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
