On 01/18/2012 12:12 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Cedric Greevey<cgree...@gmail.com> wrote:
don't see very many S.O.Ses or complaints from CCW, Clooj, or
LaClojure, or Enclojure users.
Probably because 60-70% of Clojure developers are using Emacs so
you'll see more questions from that group. Besides, CCW (and possibly
the other IDEs?) have their own mailing list so you don't see their
questions on the main list.
If we're going to start arguing about this (and I've got my popcorn readying in the microwave), can we at least agree to
leave out the unsupported assertions (like these two)? "Probablys" and "I suspects" don't add much to the discourse.
Just a suggestion. Now carry on!
StanD.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
