On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote:
> David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Gagnon <redalas...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > > Could this tutorial explain the foremost question people have > > when seeing core.logic: why is o appened to the names of all > > those functions? > > > > > > It's a convention from The Reasoned Schemer. It's just an easy way to > > differentiate goals from regular functions. > > Wouldn't it be more idiomatic Clojure to use namespaces? > > -Phil core.logic embraces freely mixing functional and logic programming. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
