On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > It's a convention from The Reasoned Schemer. It's just an easy way to > >> > differentiate goals from regular functions. > > What's the rationale in TRS for that? (and "conde") Like Phil (and no > doubt others) it seems an odd convention, without explanation. > > >> Wouldn't it be more idiomatic Clojure to use namespaces? > > That was my first reaction too. > > I find it a jarring clash with the rest of Clojure because I'm used to see things that are elegant or being given a good rationale of how it's a good trade-off for practical purposes. Here, it seems arbitrary and it just doesn't feel righto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
