On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > There is run, but `run` takes an extra argument `n` and will solve for > > only `n` results while `run*` solves for all. > > Ah, OK. That makes sense. Perhaps that could be added to the primer? > (just curious: why not run-all?) > core.logic's core API matches as closely as possible the one provided by the original Scheme miniKanren. While this may give core.logic a Scheme-y flavor, I'm not willing to give up on the benefits, for example: https://github.com/webyrd/TAPL-in-miniKanren-cKanren-core.logic I agree we should probably mention run N. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
