On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Shantanu Kumar <kumar.shant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If you control the third line of: >> >> (defn foo [x y] >> (let [z (bar y (next x))] >> (println "Done in " (find-name) ".") >> (* 4 z (count x)))) >> >> then don't you control the first? > > Cedric – Unfortunately, no. The target is pre-written code that may > have been created using (1) clojure.core/defn or (2) several `defxyz` > kind of macros already. Injecting a macro that internally uses `find- > name` is something I can do, hence this need.
If you can replace some other macro that code's source uses, surely you can also replace defn? You'd need to inject the clojure.core/defn wrapper into the other function's namespace, but you'd have to do that with the other macro anyway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
