> 81 (defn foo [...] > 82 (let [x (compute-something ...)] > 83 (do-something x ...) > 84 (calculate-whatever ...))) > > and you're able to edit lines 82, 83, and 84 but not line 81 (or > whatever). But I can't see any plausible circumstance where that would > be the case.
That's exactly the case. Somebody else owns/maintains `foo` and other functions/macros that `foo` corresponds with. I am only going to put in a macro in the body of `foo` in order to provide some value that is orthogonal to foo's main intent. There are several such functions (like `foo`) where I have to put in the macro. As I am not the owner of that code it does not make sense (from maintenance standpoint, currently) to control the way they are defined. Hope that clarifies. Shantanu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
