I've also attempted to use if/when-let with multiple bindings in the past. I assumed that it would behave as 'AND' and that no bindings would be available in 'else'
Cheers, Jay On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Dan Cross <cro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Aaron Cohen <aa...@assonance.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Walter Tetzner < > robot.ninja.saus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> To make the bindings work like let, where later bindings can see > previous > >> bindings, I think the most natural way to do it is to have the bindings > >> behave like the maybe monad. > >> [...] > > > > Saying something is obvious and then using the word monad a paragraph > later > > is contradictory. ;) > > Hypothetically, "this is obvious, unlike most monads." Zing! > > > What should happen on the else branch of the if-let; which bindings are > in > > scope and what would be their values? > > None of the bindings should be in scope. > > - Dan C. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
