On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mark Engelberg > <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The whole beauty of protocols, for example, is that unlike interfaces, > you > > can graft it on to a type that wasn't originally designed to support it. > > This is good, and a step forward from other languages. > > i know protocols != structural typing, but just for that excerpt, > isn't structural/duck typing good enough as well? How does duck typing support sensibly extending types you don't control? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
