Hi, Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 09:01:31 UTC+2 schrieb Nicolas Oury: > > > I think the whole thread is about the trade-off: some people complains > that deftype lacks features. >
It's not about trade-offs. It's about deftype seemingly lacking features. > Another problem with extend is that you can't access your instance > variables with it. Oh, you can! user=> (deftype Foo [x]) user.Foo user=> (defprotocol AFoo (foo [this])) AFoo user=> (extend-protocol AFoo Foo (foo [this] (.x this))) nil user=> (foo (Foo. 5)) 5 The only exception is mutable fields in the type where you don't want uncontrolled access. There you indeed need a protocol to handle the synchronisation of the field access. Kind regards Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
