> I agree with the other commenters that letfn is good when you can use > it, but here you can't use it. Your general approach is really the > best you can do, though it's nicer to use promise/deliver than atom/ > swap!, since these values are never going to change again.
I was looking for something equivalent to letrec in scheme. (Which allows slightly more than let or letfn) But your idea of a promise/deliver is nicer than my atom/reset!: it expresses the idea of closing the loop better. Thanks again. Nicolas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
