On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> my understanding is that in Clojure, every protocol generates a Java > interface, so I can't think of any reason why you couldn't list that > generated interface as a "type" in another protocol (although I haven't > tried it). > > Hmmm, thinking more about this, I wonder: is the problem that unless the protocol is implemented inline in the defrecord/deftype, it doesn't officially "implement" the corresponding the interface? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
