I think the benefits outweight the negatives, yes it's more pure going straight to LLVM and takes out one more compilation step , but having it translate to C opens up the possibility of it running on any machine architecture that has a C compiler.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Paulo Pinto <paulo.jpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 9, 4:11 pm, Mark Probst <mark.pro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Paulo Pinto <paulo.jpi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > A question that I also mentioned on the HN thread, any idea to bypass > > > C and > > > compile directly to native, for example via LLVM? > > > > No particular plans. Why would you prefer that? > > > > Mark > > I would rather not depend on an external C compiler. > > -- > Paulo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
