i came to a correct solution without that hint :)
just like in reality, i started coding without reading the spec. a few
surprises came along the way ("what? they want it like this? they just
added this to mock me!")

i spent about 50% of the time writing code and 50% thinking about it.
i'll tell my times anyone who solves it as well.
and i'm definately not going to rewrite this in java.... this is crazy....


Am 20.09.2012 19:30, schrieb David Nolen:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Jules <julesjac...@gmail.com
> <mailto:julesjac...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     This problem would be ideally suited for core.logic except because
>     of the "hint"
>     (http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/prechelt/phonecode/hint2.html) you'd
>     need to do something far more ugly.
> 
> 
> The solution I came up with doesn't attempt to encode the entire
> solution in core.logic. Also I admit the solution I came up with was a
> response to Odersky's neat version for the Scala Days 2011 Keynote and
> not the original problem.
> 
> David 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


-- 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to