2012/10/5 Bronsa <brobro...@gmail.com> > Wouldn't it be better for readevalprintlove and clojuredocs to join forces > from the beginning?
It's not clear what readevalprintlove wants to be. clojuredocs has been discussed for a while by some people who care about Clojure documentation. There are pretty specific plans about the guides and moving clojuredocs.org forward to 1.4 and (hopefully, at some point) multi-version support. In part the guides portion of clojuredocs (the organization) will follow the clojurewerkz.org projects model which is known to work well and even produced some tools we can easily reuse and adapt. readevalprintlove looks like a fancy playground so far. There are multiple aspects to good documentation, see http://jacobian.org/writing/great-documentation/ -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
