Giant +1 to moving clojuredocs.org forward. I've been getting concerned about the longevity of the site, and I would really miss it if it were gone.
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 4:35:33 PM UTC-4, Michael Klishin wrote: > > 2012/10/5 Bronsa <brob...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > >> Wouldn't it be better for readevalprintlove and clojuredocs to join >> forces from the beginning? > > > It's not clear what readevalprintlove wants to be. clojuredocs has been > discussed for a while by some people who care > about Clojure documentation. There are pretty specific plans about the > guides and moving clojuredocs.org forward > to 1.4 and (hopefully, at some point) multi-version support. In part the > guides portion of clojuredocs (the organization) > will follow the clojurewerkz.org projects model which is known to work > well and even produced some tools > we can easily reuse and adapt. > > readevalprintlove looks like a fancy playground so far. > > There are multiple aspects to good documentation, see > http://jacobian.org/writing/great-documentation/ > -- > MK > > http://github.com/michaelklishin > http://twitter.com/michaelklishin > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
