Having a map leads to pretty bad syntax for what I'm trying to do. That's why I want to metaprogram here.
I want this ... (post/all api-key) … instead of this ... ((post/api :all) api-key) Why can an ns not be passed around like anything else? David On Thursday, October 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Alan Malloy wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:03:38 PM UTC-7, David Jacobs wrote: > > I would like to create function names programmatically. So far, I have code > > that works: > > ... > > Where am I going wrong? > > > > David > > Sentence one. Don't do it that way: namespaces are not very good hashmaps, > but hashmaps are excellent at that. You already have the data that you need > to make this handler, and there's no need to scatter it into dozens of > functions: use that data to create a single function that does the > dispatching logic that you need, and put that into your ring routes or > whatever. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > (mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com) > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > (mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com) > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
