Correct me if I am wrong but, string lookup will cause problems with advanced compilation - if you are not also setting the property or method by string name.
On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:01:56 UTC+11, FrankS wrote: > > It seems you're refering to CLJS-353 - besides supporting a possible Lua > backend, it also feels semantically cleaner not to overload array and > object access - I'd vote for an additional oget/oset or obj-get/set. > > Also, the aget and aset interface have this multi-dimensional support thru > the signature: ([array i & idxs] …), and it's hard to imagine > multi-dimensional property access on an object… > > (btw, unless I'm mistaken, the multi-dimensional array support hasn't been > implemented yet for make-array and therefor the aget ([array i & idxs] …) > implementation doesn't work - can't find a JIRA issue for that) > > -FrankS. > > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:53 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > > It may be worth considering adding an oget to complement aget as was > suggesting during ClojureScript/Lua development. > > > > David > > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Evan Mezeske > > <emez...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hmm after reading that docstring, /me hopes he didn't just recommend > something for its not-intended purpose.... :) > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:29:47 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: > > Thanks - that works - that was too easy ;-) > > > > I looked at the docstring before of aget because I remembered vaguely > that that was how it used to work before .- : > > > > cljs.core/aget - Function > > > > ([array i] [array i & idxs]) > > Returns the value at the index. > > > > Dismissed it for object-access after reading that… guess we can improve > on the "clarity" of the docstring a little. > > > > -FS. > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Evan Mezeske <emez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think the easiest solution is to use "aget" and "aset". There may > be a better way, but if so I'm not aware of it. > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9861485/clojurescript-interop > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:21:45 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: > > > I understand that you can call js-methods and get properties thru: > > > > > > (.a-method some-js-object param) > > > > > > and > > > > > > (.-a-prop some-js-object) > > > > > > respectively, but how do you invoke either when you have the > method/property as a string? > > > > > > The following doesn't seem to work: > > > > > > (let [m "a-method" > > > dot-m (symbol (str "." m)] > > > (dot-m some-js-object)) > > > > > > or > > > > > > (let [m "a-prop" > > > dot--m (symbol (str ".-" m)] > > > (dot--m some-js-object)) > > > > > > And I cannot find any simple function interface for this. > > > > > > I must be overlooking something - please… > > > > > > Thanks, FrankS. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en