Correct me if I am wrong but, string lookup will cause problems with 
advanced compilation - if you are not also setting the property or method 
by string name.



On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:01:56 UTC+11, FrankS wrote:
>
> It seems you're refering to CLJS-353 - besides supporting a possible Lua 
> backend, it also feels semantically cleaner not to overload array and 
> object access - I'd vote for an additional oget/oset or obj-get/set. 
>
> Also, the aget and aset interface have this multi-dimensional support thru 
> the signature: ([array i & idxs] …), and it's hard to imagine 
> multi-dimensional property access on an object… 
>
> (btw, unless I'm mistaken, the multi-dimensional array support hasn't been 
> implemented yet for make-array and therefor the aget ([array i & idxs] …) 
> implementation doesn't work - can't find a JIRA issue for that) 
>
> -FrankS. 
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:53 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
>
> > It may be worth considering adding an oget to complement aget as was 
> suggesting during ClojureScript/Lua development. 
> > 
> > David 
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Evan Mezeske 
> > <emez...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Hmm after reading that docstring, /me hopes he didn't just recommend 
> something for its not-intended purpose....  :) 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:29:47 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: 
> > Thanks - that works - that was too easy ;-) 
> > 
> > I looked at the docstring before of aget because I remembered vaguely 
> that that was how it used to work before .- : 
> > 
> > cljs.core/aget   -   Function 
> > 
> > ([array i] [array i & idxs]) 
> >   Returns the value at the index. 
> > 
> > Dismissed it for object-access after reading that… guess we can improve 
> on the "clarity" of the docstring a little. 
> > 
> > -FS. 
> > 
> > 
> > On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Evan Mezeske <emez...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > > I think the easiest solution is to use "aget" and "aset".  There may 
> be a better way, but if so I'm not aware of it. 
> > > 
> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9861485/clojurescript-interop 
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:21:45 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: 
> > > I understand that you can call js-methods and get properties thru: 
> > > 
> > >     (.a-method some-js-object param) 
> > > 
> > > and 
> > > 
> > >     (.-a-prop some-js-object) 
> > > 
> > > respectively, but how do you invoke either when you have the 
> method/property as a string? 
> > > 
> > > The following doesn't seem to work: 
> > > 
> > >     (let [m "a-method" 
> > >           dot-m (symbol (str "." m)] 
> > >       (dot-m some-js-object)) 
> > > 
> > > or 
> > > 
> > >     (let [m "a-prop" 
> > >           dot--m (symbol (str ".-" m)] 
> > >       (dot--m some-js-object)) 
> > > 
> > > And I cannot find any simple function interface for this. 
> > > 
> > > I must be overlooking something - please… 
> > > 
> > > Thanks, FrankS. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Clojure" group. 
> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> 
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> your first post. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Clojure" group. 
> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> 
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> your first post. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to