On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:20:09 PM UTC+11, Brian Marick wrote: > hash.become(TimesliceShaped) >
For the longest time I thought you were talking about the core Hash#become (Hash#replace since 2002!). I've since become acquainted with Stunted. :) That said, I'm a sucker for "non-OO" design, even in Ruby—I tend to prefer explicitly naming the (module+)function and thus making it clear how data are being transformed. This is just a personal preference, but I suppose it might also help with not internalising any bad ideas about a given (Functional)Hash *being* a particular thing by virtue of the methods we've attached thus far. (I'll admit here and now, though, that I'm out of depth in experience, and will see how wrong I can prove myself in the coming days. :-)) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
