Hello, I am trying to understand the rationale behind the current implementation of some-fn and every-pred, there seems to be a couple of odd things, or maybe that is just me misunderstanding their doc.
user> ((every-pred (fn [_]))) true user> ((some-fn (fn [_]))) nil Shouldn't the first example return false? since the first function always returns nil? I was also wondering if it would make sense to add a 0 argument version of these, it would make their usage with apply more convenient, and comp which has a smiliar signature behaves like that: user> ((comp) true) true user> ((some-fn) true) ; Evaluation aborted. user> ((every-pred) true) ; Evaluation aborted. Max -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
