Thanks, perfect, I had prepared a patch that was identical. On Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:11:44 PM UTC+2, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > Tassilo Horn <ts...@gnu.org <javascript:>> writes: > > >>> user> ((some-fn) <no-matter-what>) > >>> false > >>> user> ((every-pred) <no-matter-what>) > >>> true > >>> > >>> e.g. (some-cn) was equivalent to (constantly false) and (every-pred) > was > >>> equivalent to (constantly true). > >> > >> Yes I understand that, the proposal was just to avoid exceptions when > >> used with apply, but this could end up be bit confusing maybe, and it > >> can be tested beforehand anyway. > > > > No, I think it's a valid request and it wouldn't be more confusing than > > (and) => true (or) => false. I'll create a ticket and patch for it. > > Done, see http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1094 > > In contrast to what's written above, I decided to make (some-fn) to be > (constantly nil), which matches the behavior of `some` better than > (constantly false). > > Bye, > Tassilo >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
