+1 That would be nice. This may not be the right place for the suggestion though.
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:43:58 PM UTC+2, Max Penet wrote: > > wrong commit: > https://github.com/mpenet/clojure/commit/9c6e47524dc21c6bdfaa9d0cc2a69377cc69cbf3 > > > On Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:35:01 PM UTC+2, Max Penet wrote: >> >> Another enhancement proposal, would it be possible to have a future-call >> arity with an additional argument as the ExecutorService used. It seems to >> be a trivial but useful modification, but I wanted to ask here before >> creating a ticket for this. >> >> Something like this maybe: >> https://github.com/mpenet/clojure/commit/e5295ac1aa49036c98a3a4e18cba974cd72483d5 >> >> Max >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
