Yes I know, but my membership approval is still pending on clojure-dev (CA 
on the way), and from what I have read, I am supposed to ask first on the 
ML before creating a JIRA ticket.

http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/JIRA+workflow

Slow process... 


Max

On Saturday, October 27, 2012 1:02:42 PM UTC+2, Casper Clausen wrote:
>
> +1 That would be nice. This may not be the right place for the suggestion 
> though.
>
> On Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:43:58 PM UTC+2, Max Penet wrote:
>>
>> wrong commit: 
>> https://github.com/mpenet/clojure/commit/9c6e47524dc21c6bdfaa9d0cc2a69377cc69cbf3
>>  
>>
>> On Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:35:01 PM UTC+2, Max Penet wrote:
>>>
>>> Another enhancement proposal, would it be possible to have a future-call 
>>> arity with an additional argument as the ExecutorService used. It seems to 
>>> be a trivial but useful modification, but I wanted to ask here before 
>>> creating a ticket for this. 
>>>
>>> Something like this maybe: 
>>> https://github.com/mpenet/clojure/commit/e5295ac1aa49036c98a3a4e18cba974cd72483d5
>>>
>>> Max
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to