> > It would be nice if clojure.core/conj had a unary implementation > > ([coll] coll) >
I support this. Reasons: 1. It makes sense, adding nothing to something should give back the something. 2. It's consistent with disj as mentioned. 3. Supporting edge cases like this can make some algorithms much more succinct. (as in CGAT's code - no need to check for extra cases) Compare: (conj nil 3) => (3) Jonathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
