On Sunday, November 4, 2012 12:43:22 AM UTC+1, Ben wrote: > There might be a reason to write (apply f coll seqable) in a situation > in which f might be conj, though. >
One may use (reduce f coll seqable) instead, if that makes sense semantically in that context. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
